Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the CCTV and fire alarm systems, which could not be removed from site without prior dismantling, were excisable goods liable to classification under the cited tariff headings and whether pre-deposit of duty and penalty should be waived pending appeal.
Analysis: The items were installed systems and, on the stated facts, could not be moved as such from the site without first being dismantled. On that basis, the principle that goods must have the character of marketable movable goods for excisability applied. The earlier decision concerning installed fire alarm systems was treated as applicable to the facts before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An installed system that cannot be removed from the site without dismantling does not satisfy the test of marketability as movable goods for excise purposes.