Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rubber and metal bonded parts manufactured for and supplied to the Indian Railways were correctly classifiable under Heading 8607.00.
Analysis: The goods were found to be designed specifically for use in railway applications and to have no use elsewhere. The same material had already been considered by the appellate authority, and the Tribunal saw no reason to differ from that classification finding. The exclusive railway use and design of the goods supported classification under the railway heading rather than the claimed alternative heading.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 8607.00 was upheld and the challenge to that classification failed.