Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a revision petition filed under section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and pending before the Commissioner on the date of declaration could be treated as a pending revision for the purposes of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998.
Analysis: The revision petition complained not only of waiver of interest but also of incorrect calculation of interest. Section 264 empowers the Commissioner to revise orders of subordinate authorities and to pass appropriate orders where the grievance concerns legality or correctness of the order, including errors in interest computation. On that basis, the revision was maintainable to the extent of the interest calculation dispute and was pending when the declaration was filed. Once such a revision was pending, the condition in section 95(i)(c) of the Scheme was satisfied, and the designated authority could not reject the declaration on the footing that no valid revision was pending. The refusal to entertain the declaration was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The revision petition was a valid pending revision for the limited purpose of the interest calculation dispute, and the declaration under the Scheme was rightly held to be maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A revision petition under section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is maintainable where it raises a legitimate grievance as to the correctness of an assessment-related interest computation, and such a pending revision satisfies the statutory condition for invoking the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998.