Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the decretal amount could be corrected to reflect the total liability after accounting for amounts already recovered; (ii) whether time for payment of the balance decretal amount could be granted in instalments with the execution proceedings kept in abeyance pending compliance.
Issue (i): whether the decretal amount could be corrected to reflect the total liability after accounting for amounts already recovered
Analysis: The record showed that two decrees had been passed against the appellant, but the earlier order and the execution material disclosed both liabilities. The Court accepted that the decretal figure recorded in the operative order did not accurately reflect the full principal sum, and that credit had to be given for the amount already recovered by the Custodian.
Conclusion: The decretal amount was liable to be corrected and reduced by giving credit for the amount already recovered.
Issue (ii): whether time for payment of the balance decretal amount could be granted in instalments with the execution proceedings kept in abeyance pending compliance
Analysis: The Court accepted a structured payment schedule for the balance amount, linking continuation of the stay on the garnishee proceedings to timely payment. It directed payment in instalments within a fixed period and provided that default would revive the earlier order.
Conclusion: Time for payment was granted in instalments and the garnishee proceedings were kept stayed subject to compliance.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was disposed of by correcting the decretal figure, adjusting for amounts already recovered, and permitting phased payment of the balance with a conditional stay of execution.