Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 6/2000 when the classification of the yarn was already held to fall under Chapter 55 and had attained finality.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the classification of the yarn manufactured by the appellants. The record showed that the classification under Heading 52.05 had already been negatived in earlier proceedings, and that order had not been challenged further. Once the classification issue had attained finality against the appellants, the basis for claiming exemption under the notification ceased to survive. Since the goods were held classifiable under Chapter 55, the benefit of the notification was not available.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 6/2000, and the demand and penalty were sustained.