Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether nylon chips arising at an intermediate stage in the manufacture of nylon filament yarn were marketable and therefore capable of being subjected to central excise duty, notwithstanding their captive consumption.
Analysis: The product was found to be cleared by the assessee on payment of duty in some cases, which supported marketability. The fact that captively consumed nylon chips were not packed or sprayed with nitrogen did not make them incapable of being brought to market, because packing and precautionary measures are relevant to actual marketing and not to the inherent ability of the goods to be sold. The applicable test was whether the goods were capable of being brought to the market for sale, and the evidence showed that nylon chips were such goods, even if they required packing and spraying before despatch.
Conclusion: The nylon chips were marketable and the Revenue had discharged the burden of showing marketability; the assessee was not entitled to refund.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods remain marketable if they are capable of being brought to market for sale, and the need for packing or other precautions before marketing does not ate marketability merely because the same goods are captively consumed without such treatment.