Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of exemption from duty on the specified goods cleared during 1-3-1992 to 10-3-1992 was available under the SSI scheme, and whether Notification No. 53/92 dated 10-3-1992 could be treated as an amending notification with retrospective effect.
Analysis: The goods were covered by Notification No. 202/88-C.E. until it was amended by Notification No. 33/92 dated 1-3-1992, after which they stood excluded from exemption. Notification No. 53/92 dated 10-3-1992 restored the exemption, but there was nothing in its text to show that it was intended as an amending notification with retrospective operation. It was treated as an independent notification, not as one curing any earlier anomaly. The contention based on doubt in interpretation was also rejected because the intent of the later notification was found to be clear.
Conclusion: The exemption was not admissible for the period 1-3-1992 to 10-3-1992, and the appeal failed.