Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether relief under section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 could be invoked to avoid consequences arising from non-filing of the statement of affairs and to secure protection against criminal proceedings under the Indian Penal Code.
Analysis: The application was framed under several provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, but the substantive attempt was to obtain protection from liability and consequential action by relying on section 633. The Court held that the provision has a limited scope and cannot be stretched to confer undue benefit. It further noted that section 633 cannot be resorted to for liabilities arising under the Indian Penal Code, and therefore cannot be used as a shield against criminal proceedings of that nature.
Conclusion: Relief under section 633(2) was not available for the reliefs sought, particularly in relation to criminal liability under the Indian Penal Code, and the application failed.
Final Conclusion: The request for protective and ancillary directions was rejected, leaving the applicants without the relief sought.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 633 of the Companies Act, 1956 is confined to liabilities arising under that Act and cannot be invoked to obtain exculpation from criminal liability under the Indian Penal Code.