Pre-existing trade mark on recycled goods cannot be conclusively treated as infringement by customs without proper adjudication.

Recycled imported inkjet cartridges bearing a pre-existing HP mark raised the question whether customs could treat the mark as falsification or trade mark infringement under Section 77 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The record indicated that the goods were intended for sale under a different brand and that the HP logo had not been tampered with in the statutory sense. Since infringement was a matter for the competent authority, customs could not conclusively reject clearance on that basis. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with natural justice.

---

---

Issues: Whether the presence of the "HP" logo on recycled inkjet cartridges amounted to falsification or infringement of trade mark rights under Section 77 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, and whether the customs authorities could finally reject clearance on that basis.

Analysis: The cartridges were imported as recycled goods intended to be sold under the brand name "Expert", and the record showed that they bore an existing engraved HP mark on account of prior use. The dispute as to whether such continuing mark constituted an offence under the trade mark law was one for the competent authority to determine, and customs could not pre-judge that issue. The trade mark itself had not been tampered with in the sense contemplated by Section 77(1), and the appellants had not imported goods intended to bear the HP mark. In the circumstances, the request for clearance after defacing the logo or, alternatively, for re-export required reconsideration.

Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after observing the principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed by way of de novo remand.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was not finally decided on merits, and the adjudicating authority was directed to reconsider the matter afresh.

Ratio Decidendi: Where recycled imported goods bear a pre-existing mark, the customs authorities cannot conclusively determine trade mark infringement without adjudication by the competent authority, and the matter may require remand for fresh decision consistent with natural justice.

---