Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether twisted filament yarn subjected to winding was liable to central excise duty or was entitled to exemption under the relevant notifications, and whether the Revenue appeal against the allowance of such exemption should succeed.
Analysis: Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 54 treats twisting and allied processes on filament yarn as manufacture, but duty liability still depends on the product attaining a marketable form. The finding accepted was that twisted yarn becomes marketable only after winding, and that the wound twisted yarn falls within the nil-rate exemption for yarn under the relevant notification when produced out of duty-paid yarn. The same issue had already been decided in earlier appeals and was followed consistently, leaving no basis to sustain the Revenue's challenge.
Conclusion: The twisted and wound filament yarn was held eligible for exemption and not liable to duty, so the Revenue's challenge failed.