Registered Charge Requirement in winding up determines secured status and leaves an unregistered claim unsecured.

An unregistered charge does not bind the liquidator or other creditors in winding up, so a lender cannot be treated as a secured creditor merely because it claims hypothecation, mortgage or pari passu rights. The Official Liquidator was entitled to reject the claim where no duly registered charge was produced, and appellate interference was unwarranted because the record supported that assessment. The claim had to be valued as on the date of the winding up order, and later interest or enhancement could not convert an unsecured debt into a secured one. In the absence of registration under the Companies Act, 1956, the creditor's claim ranked only as unsecured.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the order of rejection passed by the Official Liquidator suffered from any legal error warranting interference in appeal. (ii) Whether the State Financial Corporation could be treated as a secured creditor in the winding up proceedings.

Issue (i): Whether the order of rejection passed by the Official Liquidator suffered from any legal error warranting interference in appeal.

Analysis: The appellate court's power under rule 164 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, is confined to correcting findings that are clearly wrong or legally unsustainable. The Corporation failed to place before the Official Liquidator material establishing a duly registered charge in its favour, despite opportunity. The statement of account by itself did not prove creation of a charge, and the Official Liquidator was entitled to reject the claim on the materials produced before him. The rejection was therefore examined on the record and found to be based on an appropriate appreciation of the evidence.

Conclusion: The rejection order did not call for interference.

Issue (ii): Whether the State Financial Corporation could be treated as a secured creditor in the winding up proceedings.

Analysis: Under sections 124 to 127 of the Companies Act, 1956, a charge must be registered with the Registrar of Companies to be effective against the liquidator and other creditors. Hypothecation, mortgage or pari passu arrangements inter se the parties do not by themselves create an enforceable secured status against the liquidator unless the charge is duly registered. The Corporation had no registered Form No. 8 charge in its favour, though a registered charge existed in favour of the other creditor. The claim was also to be valued as on the date of the winding up order under rule 154 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, and later interest or enhanced amounts could not alter that position. In the absence of a registered charge, the debt could not be treated as secured for winding up purposes.

Conclusion: The Corporation was not a secured creditor and its claim ranked only as an unsecured debt.

Final Conclusion: The appellate challenge failed because the Official Liquidator's determination was consistent with the statutory scheme governing proof of debt, registration of charges, and valuation of claims in winding up.

Ratio Decidendi: A charge must be registered under the Companies Act, 1956 to bind the liquidator and creditors in winding up, and in its absence a creditor's claim remains unsecured and is valued as on the date of the winding up order.

---