Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the enhanced valuation of imported goods and the continued insistence on extra duty deposit during pendency of Special Valuation Branch investigation were justified in view of the Board's circular governing provisional assessment.
Analysis: The imported goods were subjected to enhanced value and duty was recovered provisionally, although the importer's case had already been registered for Special Valuation Branch investigation. The circular governing such cases prescribed that only 1% extra duty deposit was to be retained, and that where provisional assessment continued beyond the stipulated period after reply to the questionnaire, the extra duty deposit was to be discontinued. The continued loading of value and recovery beyond the permissible deposit were contrary to the circular instructions and could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The enhancement of value and the recovery of duty in excess of 1% extra duty deposit were held unsustainable. The imports were directed to be assessed provisionally at the invoice price without loading, and the excess amount recovered was directed to be refunded.
Ratio Decidendi: During pendency of Special Valuation Branch investigation, provisional assessment must conform to the governing Board circular, and continued enhancement or recovery beyond the prescribed extra duty deposit is impermissible.