Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery proceedings in respect of the disputed customs duty.
Analysis: The exemption claim was based on Notification No. 140/91-Cus. dated 22-10-1991. The adjudicating authority had denied the benefit on the footing that the imported items were not capital goods, while the appellate authority had accepted them as capital goods but raised a different objection regarding use for development of software for export. The record also contained a Chartered Engineer's certificate supporting such use. In these circumstances, and in view of the appellate authority's finding on the nature of the goods as capital goods, the application for interim relief was considered fit for grant.
Conclusion: The stay application was allowed and pre-deposit was waived.