Modvat credit on ramming mass depends on proof of actual use in manufacture, not mere eligibility by category.

Modvat credit on ramming mass requires proof that the input was actually used in or in relation to manufacture, not merely that it is of a kind generally eligible for credit. Reliance on decisions concerning similar items is insufficient unless the assessee establishes the manner, mode and purpose of use. Because the assessee did not disclose the actual use of ramming mass in response to the show cause notice and no finding on actual use was recorded, the credit could not be sustained on the material before the appellate authority.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit on ramming mass could be allowed without proof of its actual use in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product.

Analysis: The entitlement to Modvat credit depends not only on the nature of the goods but also on proof that the goods were actually used in or in relation to manufacture. Mere reliance on decisions allowing credit on similar items is insufficient unless the assessee establishes the manner, mode, and purpose of use. Here, the respondent did not disclose the actual use of ramming mass in the reply to the show cause notice, and no finding on actual use was recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals). The order allowing credit therefore proceeded without examining the essential factual foundation for Rule 57A.

Conclusion: Modvat credit could not be sustained on the material before the Commissioner (Appeals) without proof of actual user and purpose of use of ramming mass.

---