Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether hot tops, ramming mass, thermo couple tips and moulds were inputs eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The denial of credit was based on the view that the goods were tools or part of machinery and not inputs. The Tribunal held that moulds and ramming mass fell within the wider meaning of "articles" having a significant role in manufacture, and that the final product would not emerge without them. It also noted that thermo couple tips had been held eligible as inputs in earlier Tribunal decisions. On that basis, the goods were treated as inputs used in relation to the manufacture of the final product.
Conclusion: The materials in question were eligible inputs under Rule 57A and Modvat credit could not be denied.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods having a significant and necessary role in the manufacturing process, and used in relation to manufacture, qualify as inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A even if they are repeatedly replaced or are in the nature of tools or equipment.