Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied for defects in dealer's invoices where the goods were duty-paid and the invoice particulars were subsequently rectified.
Analysis: The admissibility of credit was examined on the basis that the manufacturer's invoice under Rule 52A supported the dealer's invoice and that the duty paying character of the goods was not in dispute. The defects relating to time of removal, quantity, assessable value and other particulars were treated as lapses capable of rectification. Since the Commissioner had accepted the corrected particulars and the revenue did not dispute that rectification, the absence of the original particulars was not treated as a sufficient ground to deny credit. The statutory requirements under the amended invoicing scheme introduced by Notification No. 33/94 (N.T.) and Rule 57GG were therefore viewed in the light of rectifiable defects rather than as an absolute bar in the facts of the case.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not liable to be denied on the invoice defects in question, and the revenue appeal failed.