Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings under section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956 for recovery against a director of a company in liquidation abate on his death and whether his legal representatives can be brought on record and proceeded against to the extent of the estate inherited by them.
Analysis: The legal position was treated as settled that misfeasance proceedings are compensatory in nature and do not create a new liability. A director's death does not bring about abatement of such proceedings, and the Official Liquidator may continue them against the legal representatives. The liability of the legal representatives is confined to the extent of the estate of the deceased in their hands. Questions as to whether any property devolved upon the heirs or whether they derived benefit from the estate require evidence and cannot be decided merely on affidavits at the stage of substitution. Delay in bringing the legal representatives on record was also held not to defeat substitution in the absence of abatement.
Conclusion: The application to implead the legal heirs of the deceased director was maintainable and was rightly allowed. The proceedings could be continued against the legal representatives subject to proof regarding the estate of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi: Misfeasance proceedings under section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956 do not abate on the death of the director and may continue against his legal representatives, whose liability is limited to the estate inherited from the deceased.