Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on HDPE sacks used for packing manufactured leather cloth could be denied on the ground that they were used only as secondary packing or on a ground not disclosed in the show cause notice.
Analysis: The notice proposed denial of credit on the stated basis that the HDPE sacks were used as secondary packing and were not used in or in relation to manufacture. The notices did not allege that the cost of packing was not included in the assessable value, nor did they rest the case on any specific exclusion relating to the material of the sacks. The rules governing Modvat credit did not draw a distinction between secondary packing and other packing. Since the assessee is required to meet only the case set out in the notice, the adjudicating authority could not deny credit on a fresh ground not alleged in the notice. On the case actually pleaded, denial on the mere premise that the packing was secondary was not justified.
Conclusion: The denial of credit on the pleaded ground was unsustainable and the assessee succeeded on that issue, subject to the amount not pressed.
Final Conclusion: The order denying Modvat credit was set aside to the extent disputed, and the assessee obtained substantive relief apart from the amount not pressed.