Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim was premature because the provisional assessment of annual capacity of the stenter had not been finalised, and whether the matter required remand for fresh decision.
Analysis: The assessment of the stenter capacity was found to be provisional and not yet finalised by the revenue authorities. In that situation, the refund claim could not be finally considered on merits at that stage, because the question of correct annual capacity had first to be determined. The appropriate course was for the adjudicating authority to finalise the assessment and then examine the refund claim afresh.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held to be premature, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after finalisation of the assessment.