Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manufacturer who had opted for Notification No. 9/2000-C.E. for the financial year 2000-2001 could withdraw that option during the same year and switch to Notification No. 8/2000-C.E.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 9/2000-C.E. was subject to a condition that the option, once exercised, could not be withdrawn during the remaining period of the financial year. The assessee had specifically opted for that notification at the beginning of the year, when both notifications were available. The Board's letter relied upon by the assessee related to different notifications and did not govern the notifications involved in the present case.
Conclusion: The assessee was bound by the option already exercised under Notification No. 9/2000-C.E. and could not switch to Notification No. 8/2000-C.E. during the same financial year.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the demand and penalty as sustained in the impugned order remained undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification expressly prohibits withdrawal of the option during the financial year, the assessee cannot resile from the option once validly exercised.