Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit taken on capital goods before their installation and use in manufacture of the final product was liable to be disallowed outright, or whether the assessee's subsequent eligibility after installation required fresh examination.
Analysis: The credit had been availed during a period when the capital goods were admittedly not installed or put to use, attracting the prohibition under Rule 57Q(7) of the Central Excise Rules. At the same time, the record showed the assessee's case that the capital goods were later installed and used for manufacture of the final product, and that the authorities below had not examined whether the credit, though initially irregularly taken, could be retained or adjusted once eligibility arose. Since that aspect went to the core of the claim, it required reconsideration on merits.
Conclusion: The matter was required to be re-examined by the adjudicating authority, and the order confirming denial of credit was set aside.