Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 121/92 dated 1-3-92 and consequential refund, and whether the question of unjust enrichment required consideration.
Analysis: The goods were treated as falling within the description of electrical measuring, checking and analysing instruments covered by the notification. The proviso excluding goods that had already obtained the benefit of specified customs notifications did not apply, as the assessee had not availed any benefit under those notifications. On that basis, the denial of exemption was unsustainable. The question of unjust enrichment, however, was left to be examined by the adjudicating authority in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to the exemption and refund claim, subject to examination of unjust enrichment by the adjudicating authority.