Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether mill neps were textile material classifiable under Chapter Heading 5601.00 and whether the demand, confiscation and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view that mill nep is a small knot-like aggregate of tightly entangled fibres and, on the material placed, does not satisfy the ordinary trade or technical understanding of a textile material. Mill neps were separately recognised in the tariff and their addition to blended yarn did not convert the resultant product into yarn containing other textile material so as to attract the classification adopted by the Revenue. As the foundation for the duty demand and allied penal consequences failed, the reasoning on suppression and the extended period did not survive.
Conclusion: Mill neps were not textile materials classifiable under Chapter Heading 5601.00, and the duty demand, confiscation and penalty were unsustainable.