Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was required to be reversed under Rule 57C where resin, an intermediate product cleared under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. and Chapter X procedure, was used in the manufacture of dutiable final products at another factory.
Analysis: The intermediate resin was not the final product in the scheme of manufacture, since the final product was paints on which duty was paid. The clearance of the intermediate product under the exemption notification and Chapter X procedure did not change the legal position where the inputs were ultimately used in the manufacture of dutiable final products. In such a situation, Rule 57C, which disallows credit where the final products are exempt, had no application.
Conclusion: Rule 57C was not attracted and reversal of Modvat credit could not be demanded.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the assessee's claim to Modvat credit was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Modvat credit cannot be denied or reversed merely because an intermediate product is cleared under exemption or Chapter X procedure, if that product is used in the manufacture of dutiable final products.