Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Punjab Wireless Systems Limited Ordered Winding Up Due to Financial Inability</h1> <h3>HS. Oberoi & Associates Versus Punjab Wireless Systems Ltd.</h3> HS. Oberoi & Associates Versus Punjab Wireless Systems Ltd. - [2003] 115 COMP. CAS. 326 (PUNJ. & HAR.) Issues Involved:1. Petition for winding up under Sections 433 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. Outstanding dues and financial inability of the respondent-company.3. Appointment of provisional liquidator.4. Impleadment of employees' unions.5. Admission and publication of the winding-up petition.6. Financial status and management of the respondent-company.7. Final order for winding up.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Petition for Winding Up:The petitioner filed a petition under Sections 433 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking the winding up of the respondent-company. The basis of the petition was the non-payment of dues for civil works and interior construction services rendered by the petitioner to the respondent-company.2. Outstanding Dues and Financial Inability:The petitioner provided evidence of works assigned and completed through letters of intent and affirmations of satisfactory completion. Despite repeated requests and a statutory notice under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, the respondent-company failed to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 8,26,498.89 along with interest. The respondent-company acknowledged this debt in their written statement but did not make any further payments, indicating their inability to discharge financial liabilities.3. Appointment of Provisional Liquidator:During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner moved for the appointment of a provisional liquidator under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court, upon concluding that there was no possibility of revival for the respondent-company, appointed a provisional liquidator to take custody of the company's assets. This decision was challenged but upheld in Company Appeal No. 24 of 2000.4. Impleadment of Employees' Unions:Three employees' unions filed an application under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure to be impleaded, arguing that the winding-up petition would adversely affect over 1,200 employees. The court accepted their request, and the unions were added as respondents.5. Admission and Publication of the Winding-Up Petition:After hearing the parties, the court directed the publication of the admission of the winding-up petition in the Indian Express (Chandigarh edition), the Dainik Tribune, and the Official Gazette of Punjab. This was affirmed by the petitioner through an affidavit.6. Financial Status and Management of the Respondent-Company:The court noted several critical points indicating the respondent-company's dire financial situation:- Admission of a liability of Rs. 500 crores, including losses and debts.- No revival scheme proposed by the respondent-company.- Failed attempts to secure loans.- Non-payment to creditors and employees for extended periods.- Absence of substantive management, with allegations of mismanagement unrebutted.- No unencumbered assets available, with all properties mortgaged.- A report from the official liquidator detailing claims from 239 creditors amounting to over Rs. 283.01 crores.7. Final Order for Winding Up:Given the respondent-company's inability to pay its debts and the lack of any viable revival plan, the court concluded that the ingredients of Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, were satisfied. Consequently, the court ordered the winding up of Punjab Wireless Systems Limited. The official liquidator, previously appointed as the provisional liquidator, was confirmed as the liquidator to take over the company's assets and records. The order was to be published in the Indian Express, Dainik Tribune, and the Official Gazette of Punjab.The judgment comprehensively addressed the issues, detailing the financial incapacity and mismanagement of the respondent-company, leading to the inevitable conclusion of winding up.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found