Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of duty and penalty, on the ground that the thrust bearing assembly was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2000-C.E. and was not a bearing excluded from the notification.
Analysis: The duty and penalty demand arose under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the objection of limitation was linked to the invocation of the proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On the material placed, the thrust bearing assembly was described as comprising a housing bearing thrust block, bearing covers and lock nuts, with some parts manufactured as cast articles and the remaining elements procured from vendors as per drawings. In that background, the assembly was found, at least prima facie, not to be a bearing excluded from the scope of Notification No. 6/2000-C.E. dated 01.03.2000.
Conclusion: The applicants established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and for stay of recovery pending the appeal.