Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty or interest under section 42 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957 could be levied for belated payment of the composition amount due from an assessee who had opted for payment under section 66 of the Act.
Analysis: The composition scheme under section 66, read with rule 32(2) and Form No. 23, required payment of the composition amount by the stipulated date. The assessee had not paid the full admitted amount within time and remitted the balance only later. In such a case, the default arises by statutory operation itself, and the absence of a separate assessment order or demand notice does not prevent the application of section 42. The amount payable under section 42 is treated as a compensatory statutory levy for delay in remitting a quantified tax liability, rather than a discretionary exaction.
Conclusion: The levy under section 42 was held to be valid and enforceable against the assessee.