Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Debts Recovery Tribunal could entertain and adjudicate the defendants' counterclaim in a suit transferred to it under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
Analysis: The suit filed by the bank was transferred to the Tribunal under section 31 of the Act. The Tribunal had originally taken the view that the counterclaim was on a separate cause of action and outside its jurisdiction. The revision was heard in the light of the subsequent amendment to section 19, whereby sub-sections (6), (8), (9), (10) and (11) expressly enabled the Tribunal to deal with counterclaims and the applicant bank's objections. In view of that amendment, it was held unnecessary to examine the earlier order of the Tribunal on its own merits.
Conclusion: The Debts Recovery Tribunal is empowered to consider the defendants' counterclaim and the bank's objections thereto under section 19 of the Act.
Final Conclusion: The revision was disposed of by recognising the Tribunal's competence to adjudicate the counterclaim, and the transferred application was directed to be decided expeditiously.
Ratio Decidendi: Where section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 expressly authorises adjudication of counterclaims and objections, the Tribunal can entertain the defendants' counterclaim in a transferred bank recovery proceeding.