Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the small-scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93 while it had availed Modvat credit on capital goods earlier, but not during the period when the exempt clearances were made.
Analysis: The assessee had taken credit on machinery in an earlier financial year, when it was not availing the exemption, and during the relevant exemption year it had not taken any fresh Modvat credit on capital goods. The outstanding credit balance was minimal and was offered to be foregone. On these facts, the condition in the notification could not be applied so as to raise a duty demand of Rs. 3 lakhs on exempt clearances. The restriction in the notification, as applied by the adjudicating authority, was unjustified in the circumstances.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the exemption, and the demand of duty was rightly set aside.