Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether LDPE coated paper, being duty-paid input used in manufacture of composite containers, entitled the assessee to the benefit of the exemption notifications and to waiver of pre-deposit of the duty demand.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the construction of the exemption notifications governing composite containers. The assessee's case was that the coated paper used as input was duty-paid and that the notifications did not exclude such material merely because it was LDPE coated. The Revenue contended that only base paper or base paperboard, as such, could qualify. On the material placed, the input used by the assessee was treated as duty-paid paper used in manufacture, and the notification benefit was considered available at least at the prima facie stage.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to the benefit of the notifications for the limited purpose of pre-deposit, and the entire duty deposit was waived pending appeal.
Final Conclusion: The order granted interim relief to the assessee and allowed the appeal to proceed to regular hearing without pre-deposit of the duty amount.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty-paid coated paper is used as an input in manufacturing composite containers, the exemption notification may be applied in favour of the assessee at the pre-deposit stage if a prima facie case is made out.