Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal under section 483 of the Companies Act against an order passed in an appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act is maintainable notwithstanding section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Analysis: Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure bars further appeals in specified cases, but section 4(1) saves special laws unless there is a specific provision to the contrary. Section 483 of the Companies Act, as construed in earlier authority, confers a substantive right of appeal in matters of winding up, including orders passed under sections 397 and 398 read with the company jurisdiction provisions. The order under section 10F was not treated as a judgment and decree of a civil court for the purposes of section 100A, and no specific contrary provision was shown to curtail the statutory appeal under section 483.
Conclusion: The objection to maintainability was rejected and the appeal was held maintainable.
Final Conclusion: The special statutory appellate remedy under the Companies Act was preserved, and the appeal was admitted for hearing on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: A special statutory appeal remains available unless it is expressly taken away by a specific contrary provision; section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure does not by itself extinguish an appeal preserved by section 4(1) of that Code and section 483 of the Companies Act.