Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned goods described as plastic foot bridges were classifiable under sub-heading 3925.99, 3926.90, or 3920.90 of the Customs Tariff Act.
Analysis: The classification dispute turned on the nature of the goods and the tariff entries and chapter notes applicable to the relevant headings. On perusal of the record, the tariff entries, and the chapter note, the goods were found to answer the description under sub-heading 3920.90 rather than the classification accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals).
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under sub-heading 3920.90, the order-in-appeal was set aside, and the order-in-original was restored.