Export overvaluation and false DEPB claim led to upheld customs penalties against exporter and clearing agent.

Declared export value was found false on market verification conducted in the exporter's presence, and the exporter admitted that the price was unsupported by bills or challans. The surrounding circumstances showed overvaluation with intent to claim higher DEPB benefit, reinforced by the exporter's earlier voluntary relinquishment of the benefit. The clearing agent was found to have made false statements about verification of procurement price and was treated as an associate in the fraud. On these facts, denial of DEPB benefit and penalties under the Customs Act were upheld, and the challenge to the finding of overvaluation failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared export value of the goods was false and made to secure undue DEPB benefit, and whether the penalties imposed on the exporter and the clearing agent were justified.

Analysis: The export value declared by the appellants was found to be false on market verification conducted in the presence of the exporter. The exporter had admitted during enquiry that the declared price was not supported by bills or challans, and had also voluntarily given up the DEPB benefit earlier availed. The Tribunal held that the surrounding circumstances showed overvaluation with the intention of claiming higher DEPB benefit. The clearing agent was also found to have made false statements about verification of the procurement price and was treated as an associate in the fraud. On these facts, the denial of DEPB benefit and the penalties imposed under the Customs Act were upheld.

Conclusion: The challenge to the finding of overvaluation and to the penalties failed.

---