Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine and substantial penalty could be sustained where the assessee was an SSI unit covered by an exemption notification and the goods were also found exempt, and whether only a penalty for non-issuance of a covering invoice was warranted.
Analysis: The assessee was found to be an SSI unit working under the exemption notification and had not crossed the prescribed limit. The record did not show any effective enquiry by the Revenue to determine the exact nature of the goods. On the facts accepted in the order, even the goods described as copper ingots were exempt from duty under the notification. In these circumstances, no duty was payable and confiscation of the goods, imposition of redemption fine, and the confirmed penalty could not be legally sustained. The lapse remained only the failure to issue the covering invoice while clearing the goods.
Conclusion: The duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine and major penalties were not sustainable, and only a nominal penalty for non-issuance of the covering invoice was justified.
Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained substantially favourable relief, with the impugned order set aside except for a reduced penalty.