Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty and interest were sustainable where Modvat credit was taken twice on the basis of stipulated documents and the excess credit was later reversed on detection of the error.
Analysis: The credit had been taken once on invoices and again on a 57E certificate issued by the supplier and countersigned by the jurisdictional Superintendent. The record indicated that the duplication arose from a bona fide mistake and not from any intention to evade duty. In the absence of mens rea or deliberate violation, the conditions for penalty under Rule 57AH and for interest under Section 11AB were not made out, and the invocation of Section 11AC was also unsustainable.
Conclusion: Penalty and interest were not leviable and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excess Modvat credit is taken on the basis of prescribed documents due to a bona fide mistake and there is no intent to evade duty, penalty and interest provisions cannot be invoked.