Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bulk tea cleared in tea chests or gunny bags exceeding 20 kg, bearing the company's name or mark, was liable to excise duty for the period 2-6-1998 to 23-6-1998, in view of the withdrawal notification issued on 24-6-1998.
Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the earlier decision of the Gauhati High Court on the same question. On that view, bulk tea removed in tea chests or gunny bags did not fall within the expression "tea put up in unit container with a brand name" and was not exigible to duty for the disputed period. The later notification was, therefore, not treated as making such clearances dutiable for that interval.
Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the demand and penalty were set aside, with consequential relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Bulk tea cleared in tea chests or gunny bags did not amount to tea put up in unit containers with a brand name and, for that reason, was not liable to excise duty for the relevant period.