Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the capital goods imported and procured duty-free for use in the export-oriented unit violated the exemption conditions so as to justify confiscation, duty demand, and penalties, and whether the redemption fine and penalties required reduction.
Analysis: The record did not establish non-utilisation of the capital goods beyond reasonable doubt. The relevant export-import policy permitted inter-unit transfer of goods of an EOU/EPZ unit, subject to accounting and the conditions of the exemption scheme. Under the exemption notification governing the imported goods, transfer to another unit required permission of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs. Since such permission had not been obtained, the demand and adverse findings could not be disturbed. At the same time, the evidentiary deficiency on full non-utilisation justified some moderation in the monetary consequences.
Conclusion: The impugned order was sustained, but the redemption fine and penalties were reduced.