Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants made out a prima facie case for full waiver of pre-deposit in an excise matter involving Modvat credit and consequential penalty.
Analysis: The inputs on which Modvat credit had been taken were found, on the technical material relied upon, not to be suitable for manufacture of HDPE pipes as per the DoT specification. The Tribunal held that the appellants had not established that the credited inputs were used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product, and therefore they did not present a strong prima facie case for unconditional waiver. At the same time, the appellants' financial hardship was noticed and comparable orders in similar matters were considered.
Conclusion: Full waiver of pre-deposit was declined. The appellants were directed to deposit Rs. 35 lakhs within eight weeks, with recovery of the balance duty and penalty stayed during pendency, and pre-deposit of the partner's penalty was waived.
Ratio Decidendi: In an application for waiver of pre-deposit, where the assessee fails to show a prima facie case on merits, the Tribunal may insist on partial pre-deposit and stay the balance recovery while considering financial hardship.