Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the pre-deposit made during the earlier proceedings could be claimed as refund after the assessee opted for settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme and the designated authority adjusted that amount while computing the duty arrears.
Analysis: The pre-deposit had been made pursuant to the appellate proceedings and was specifically taken into account while working out the amount payable under the settlement scheme. Under the scheme, part payments or deposits already made are treated as amounts paid towards the duties, fine, penalties or interest in dispute, and only the balance is reckoned as arrears for settlement. Once the assessee voluntarily opted for the scheme, declared the amount accordingly, and obtained settlement on that basis, the adjustment became final. In such circumstances, the assessee could not reopen the settlement or seek refund of the very amount that had been appropriated in computing the scheme liability.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not maintainable and the rejection of the claim was correct.