Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2001 (7) TMI 1218 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tenancy rights in liquidation cannot be attached on bare allegations, and unused premises must be returned to the landlord. Tenancy rights of a company in liquidation under the Bombay Rent Act are not automatically transferable, assignable, or attachable; the statutory ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Tenancy rights in liquidation cannot be attached on bare allegations, and unused premises must be returned to the landlord.

                          Tenancy rights of a company in liquidation under the Bombay Rent Act are not automatically transferable, assignable, or attachable; the statutory prohibition in section 15(1) is subject to limited exceptions, but those exceptions did not apply where the business had ceased and there was no transfer of a live business with stock-in-trade and goodwill. The Court also noted that attachment before judgment under Order 38 CPC and appointment of a receiver under Order 40 CPC require a prima facie basis and cannot rest on bare allegations or financial distress. Separately, where tenanted premises are not required for beneficial winding up, the Official Liquidator must surrender possession to the landlord under section 457 of the Companies Act, 1956.




                          Issues: (i) whether the tenancy rights of a company in liquidation under the Bombay Rent Act were capable of being transferred, assigned or attached so as to support an order of attachment before judgment and appointment of a receiver; (ii) whether, on winding up, the Official Liquidator was bound to retain the tenanted premises or had to hand over possession to the landlord when the premises were not required for beneficial winding up.

                          Issue (i): whether the tenancy rights of a company in liquidation under the Bombay Rent Act were capable of being transferred, assigned or attached so as to support an order of attachment before judgment and appointment of a receiver.

                          Analysis: The prohibition on transfer or assignment under section 15(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rents Control Act, 1947 is not absolute, but the recognised exceptions were held not to apply on the facts. The record showed that the company's business had already ceased, the premises were locked up by the Receiver, and the assets were not being dealt with as a going concern. The notification under the proviso to section 15(1) could not assist the Bank because there was no transfer of the entire interest in leasehold premises together with a live business, stock-in-trade and goodwill. The Court further held that attachment before judgment under Order 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 could not rest on bald allegations or mere financial difficulty, and the material on record disclosed no prima facie basis for such drastic relief. Appointment of a receiver under Order 40 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was likewise unsupported for the immovable premises.

                          Conclusion: The tenancy rights were not shown to be attachable or assignable on the facts, and the orders of attachment before judgment and receivership in respect of the immovable premises were unsustainable.

                          Issue (ii): whether, on winding up, the Official Liquidator was bound to retain the tenanted premises or had to hand over possession to the landlord when the premises were not required for beneficial winding up.

                          Analysis: The governing principle under section 457 of the Companies Act, 1956 is that where a company is being wound up and the Official Liquidator does not require tenanted premises for carrying on business or for beneficial winding up, possession should be handed back to the landlord. The company had been defunct for years before the winding-up order, and the Official Liquidator expressly stated that the premises were not required for beneficial winding up. On that basis, the landlord's claim to possession was accepted.

                          Conclusion: The Official Liquidator was required to surrender possession of the premises to the landlord.

                          Final Conclusion: The appeals failed because the immovable premises could not be retained under a legally sustainable attachment or receivership, and the liquidator had no continuing need to keep the tenanted property for winding up.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A tenant's interest in premises cannot be attached before judgment on mere assertions or financial distress, and where a company in liquidation does not need tenanted premises for beneficial winding up, possession must be restored to the landlord.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found