Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether roofing felt was classifiable under Chapter 59 / heading 5909.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and entitled to exemption under Notification No. 53/95 dated 20-3-95, or whether it was to be treated as roofing board under Chapter 68 so as to deny the exemption and SSI benefit under Notification No. 175/86.
Analysis: The classification dispute had already been examined in the assessee's own earlier case and in another Tribunal decision concerning the same product. The product was found to be roofing felt made of coated or impregnated textile fabric, and Chapter 68, Note (C) excludes coated, impregnated or covered textile fabrics of Chapter 56 or 59 from Chapter 68. The Tribunal followed the earlier finding that the chemical report and the nature of the product supported its treatment as rot-proof / fire-resistant roofing felt, not roofing board, and therefore the departmental proposal to shift it to Chapter 68 could not be sustained. Since the same issue had already been decided on the same product, the earlier ratio was applied.
Conclusion: Roofing felt was classifiable under Chapter 59 / heading 5909.00 and was not classifiable under Chapter 68; the exemption under Notification No. 53/95 could not be denied on the departmental classification theory, and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned classification and exemption view in favour of the assessee was affirmed, leaving no merit in the Revenue's challenge.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the product is a coated or impregnated textile fabric covered by Chapter 59, Chapter 68 cannot apply because of the express exclusion in Note (C), and a prior decision on the same product and issue should be followed absent any distinguishing feature.