Court dismisses appeal, classifies chromium sulphate & oxides under specific headings, rejecting appellant's classification claim. The appeal was dismissed as the court classified chromium sulphate under Heading 28.33 and oxides under Heading 28.19, rejecting the appellant's claim for ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court dismisses appeal, classifies chromium sulphate & oxides under specific headings, rejecting appellant's classification claim.
The appeal was dismissed as the court classified chromium sulphate under Heading 28.33 and oxides under Heading 28.19, rejecting the appellant's claim for different classifications as inorganic tanning substances or pigments.
The appeal considered the classification of chromium sulphate and oxides under the central excise tariff. The appellant's claim for classification under different headings was rejected. Chromium sulphate was classified under Heading 28.33 and the oxides under Heading 28.19, not as inorganic tanning substances or pigments as claimed by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed based on these classifications.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.