Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sick industrial company should be ordered to be wound up on the basis of the BIFR opinion and, consequentially, whether an Official Liquidator should be appointed and possession of assets handed over to him.
Analysis: The matter arose from an opinion under section 20(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, recommending winding up. The Court found no objection or alternative proposal warranting a different view and accepted the BIFR's conclusion that revival was no longer feasible. On that basis, the Court directed winding up of the company. Consequent to the winding-up order, the Official Liquidator was appointed to take over possession of the company's assets and books of account, and the person in possession of the assets was directed to hand them over in consultation with the Official Liquidator.
Conclusion: The company was ordered to be wound up and the Official Liquidator was appointed to take charge of its assets and records.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory authority's opinion under section 20(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 indicates that revival is not feasible and no contrary material is placed before the Court, the Court may accept the opinion and order winding up with consequential steps for administration of the company's assets.