Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for payment of Central Excise duty by cheque, the relevant date is the date of presentation of the cheque in the bank or the date of clearance or realisation of the cheque.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the interaction between the earlier Central Treasury Rules and the Central Government Account (Receipts and Payments) Rules, 1983. The later rules contain specific provisions governing Government dues tendered by cheque, and the Tribunal noted that those provisions had not been fully examined in the authorities and decisions relied upon below. In view of the specific scheme of Rules 19 and 20 of the 1983 Rules, and because earlier Tribunal and High Court decisions had proceeded without such examination, the matter required consideration by a Larger Bench.
Conclusion: The Tribunal did not finally decide the substantive question and referred it to a Larger Bench for determination.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was not finally resolved on merits and the controversy over the relevant date of payment by cheque was left for decision by a Larger Bench.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later and specific statutory payment regime governs Government dues, its effect must be examined before applying more general rules, and a substantial conflict on the applicable date of payment may justify reference to a Larger Bench.