Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether components and spares used in the manufacture of railway carriage fans were eligible as inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, notwithstanding the exclusion relating to capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The components and spares were used in the manufacture of the final product, railway carriage fans, and became an integral part of those fans. Rule 57Q treated as capital goods the components and spares of the goods specified in that rule, but the exclusion from Rule 57A operated only where the items were capital goods used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about a change in substance in relation to manufacture. Here, the disputed items were not used as capital goods in that sense; they were incorporated into the final product and cleared along with it on payment of duty. The subsequent grant of credit for the later period also supported the same treatment.
Conclusion: The disputed components and spares were admissible as inputs under Rule 57A, and the denial of Modvat credit was unsustainable.