TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of duty arising from return of crane parts for repair under Rule 173H(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be sustained when the assessee's request for relaxation of the time limit and waiver of duty-paying documents was not considered on merits and the matter required fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The returned goods were only certain parts of the crane, and the assessee had sought relaxation of the prescribed period as well as waiver of the requirement of production of duty-paying documents on the very day the parts were received. Such applications, made under the second and third provisos to sub-rule (2), had to be examined by the competent authority in a quasi-judicial manner on their merits. The rejection by letter without such adjudication was contrary to the principles of natural justice. The demand could not extend beyond the crane parts returned for repair and re-supplied after processing, and a demand on the entire crane was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The matter had to be remanded for fresh decision on the assessee's applications and for adjudication of the show-cause notice in accordance with law. The assessee succeeded to the extent that the impugned orders were set aside and the demand was confined to the returned parts, not the entire crane.
TaxTMI 
