Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the winding up order could be sustained when the company petition was not served at the company's registered office and the notice was effected only at an incorrect address and by advertisement.
Analysis: Rule 27 and Rule 28 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 require service of the notice of petition and copy of the petition on the company in the prescribed manner, ordinarily at its registered office, and only in the absence of a registered office at the principal or last known principal place of business. The registered office of the company had been intimated to the Registrar of Companies as shifted to Sriperumbudur, and the materials showed that the petition and advertisements proceeded on the old Chennai address. In a winding up matter, strict compliance with the prescribed mode of service is mandatory because an order of winding up has serious civil consequences.
Conclusion: The service was invalid and the winding up order could not be sustained. The order winding up the company was set aside and the company petition was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: In a winding up proceeding, service of the company petition in the manner prescribed by the Companies (Court) Rules, including service at the registered office where one exists, is mandatory, and an order passed without such proper service is liable to be set aside.