Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for purposes of interim relief, freight and insurance charges were prima facie excludible from assessable value on the footing that the sale stood appropriated at the factory gate and the customer's premises were not the place of removal.
Analysis: The order noted the competing views on valuation under the amended section 4 regime and the relevance of the contract terms governing delivery, transportation, and insurance. It accepted, at least prima facie, that where goods are earmarked and appropriated at the factory gate and transportation and transit insurance are separately arranged, the post-clearance freight and insurance charges may not form part of assessable value. On that basis, the demand was treated as appearing unsustainable at the interim stage.
Conclusion: The appellant was granted waiver of pre-deposit and recovery of the disputed duty and penalty was stayed during pendency of the appeal.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted because the appellant established a strong prima facie case against inclusion of the disputed freight and insurance charges in the assessable value.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are appropriated to the contract at the factory gate and transportation and insurance are separately undertaken after such appropriation, the disputed post-clearance charges may be kept out of assessable value at the interim stage.