Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cess could validly be levied on the hydro power generating industry under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977, in the absence of compliance with the procedure prescribed for amending Schedule I.
Analysis: The levy depended on the industry being brought within Schedule I as a specified industry. Section 16 empowered the Central Government to amend Schedule I by notification, but subsection (2) required the notification to be laid before Parliament and then to receive Parliamentary approval by resolution. Mere laying of the notification before each House was not enough. The record showed that no resolution approving the notification had in fact been moved, so the condition precedent for a valid amendment of Schedule I was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The amendment to Schedule I was not validly made, and the levy of cess on the hydro power generating industry was unlawful and unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute makes delegated legislation conditional on Parliamentary approval, compliance with the approval mechanism is mandatory, and mere laying of the notification before Parliament does not by itself bring the amendment into force.