Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        1998 (10) TMI 471 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds duty drop but confirms wire confiscation, emphasizes proper accounting The Tribunal upheld the Additional Collector's decision to drop duty demand on Super Enamelled Copper wire due to lack of conclusive evidence. However, it ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                              Tribunal upholds duty drop but confirms wire confiscation, emphasizes proper accounting

                              The Tribunal upheld the Additional Collector's decision to drop duty demand on Super Enamelled Copper wire due to lack of conclusive evidence. However, it confirmed the confiscation of 12 reels of unaccounted wire ready for dispatch. The Department's claim of illicit removal and storage lacked proof, leading to the benefit of doubt for the respondents. The Tribunal disagreed on the penalty, emphasizing the need for proper accounting and remanded the case for reconsideration. A Third Member ultimately supported remanding the case based on the Vice President's findings.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Duty demand on 6270.825 kgs of Super Enamelled Copper wire.
                              2. Confiscation of 12 reels of Super Enamelled Copper wire.
                              3. Evidence of illicit removal and storage of goods.
                              4. Non-accountal of goods in RG I register.
                              5. Imposition of penalty.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Duty Demand on 6270.825 kgs of Super Enamelled Copper Wire:
                              The Revenue appealed against the order of the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad, which dropped the duty demand of Rs. 4,24,419.42 on 6270.825 kgs of Super Enamelled Copper wire. The Department alleged that the respondents manufactured and cleared these goods without payment of duty. However, the Additional Collector found no conclusive evidence that the respondents manufactured the wires found in the premises of M/s. Shashi Insulating Wires Co. or that they removed these goods illicitly. The Managing Director's statement, which was retracted, lacked corroboration. The Tribunal upheld the Additional Collector's findings, noting the absence of convincing reasons to interfere with the decision.

                              2. Confiscation of 12 Reels of Super Enamelled Copper Wire:
                              The respondents filed a cross-objection against the confiscation of 12 reels of Super Enamelled Copper wire weighing 344.205 kgs, which were found unaccounted in the RG I register. The Tribunal confirmed the order of confiscation, rejecting the respondents' argument that the wires had not reached the RG I stage. The goods were found fully manufactured, packed, and ready for dispatch, thus establishing the charge of non-accountal.

                              3. Evidence of Illicit Removal and Storage of Goods:
                              The Department's case included the recovery of six reels of Super Enamelled Copper wire from M/s. A.B. Industries, Vadodara, and evidence suggesting the respondents cleared 5727.330 kgs without payment of duty. The Additional Collector noted that M/s. A.B. Industries placed orders and made payments to M/s. Shashi Insulating Wires, not the respondents. The Tribunal found no evidence of actual manufacture by the respondents and upheld the benefit of doubt extended by the Adjudicating authority.

                              4. Non-accountal of Goods in RG I Register:
                              The Tribunal confirmed the charge of non-accountal of 12 reels of Super Enamelled Copper wire, which were found in a fully manufactured state and ready for dispatch. The respondents' argument that the goods had not reached the RG I stage was not accepted.

                              5. Imposition of Penalty:
                              The Vice President disagreed with the lenient view of the Additional Collector regarding the penalty. He emphasized that the established facts required the respondents to account for the goods in the RG I register and that the non-accountal was not merely a technical error. The Vice President also noted that the Managing Director's admission and the presence of goods with the respondents' labels in the premises of M/s. Shashi Insulating Wires and a customer indicated a preponderance of probability in favor of the Department's case. He argued for a more serious view and remanded the matter for reconsideration.

                              Separate Judgments:
                              The Vice President's order differed from the Member (Judicial), leading to a reference to a Third Member. The Third Member agreed with the Vice President's order to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter for reconsideration. Consequently, the majority opinion led to the final order remanding the case for further consideration in light of the Vice President's observations and findings.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found